Document Filing and Public Viewablity: An Open Letter to San Francisco Superior Court Presiding Judge Cynthia Ming-mei Lee To:     Cynthia Ming-mei Lee           Presiding Judge           San Francisco Superior Court           400 McAllister Street           San Francisco, CA 94102 From: S. Louis Martin           588 Sutter Street, No. 105           San Francisco, CA 94102 Date: 14 February 2015 Dear Judge Lee, I have made numerous telephone calls and trips to the court, but I have been unable to get answers to the following questions. I am Dr. S. Louis Martin, the Plaintiff in S. LOUIS MARTIN V GOOGLE, INC. (CGC-14-539972). I need precise answers to the following questions: 1. On what basis does the court post (make viewable) or not post (make unviewable) filed documents in the Register of Actions? What is the criteria? 2. Who makes the decision to post (make viewable) or not post (make unviewable) filed documents in the Register of Actions? Clerk, judge, ...? 3. In S. LOUIS MARTIN V GOOGLE, INC., only 28% of our documents were posted (made viewable). This is a high-profile case of public interest with news media and university law schools following it. One hundred percent (100%) of Defendant GOOLGE'S documents were made viewable. Is this fair? Is it not a prejudicial situation in favor of the Defendant? 4. If refiled electronically, will these documents be made viewable or not? How can this situation be remedied? Sincerely, S. Louis Martin